As the frequency and intensity of disasters increase, there is a growing need for cross-border and regional cooperation.
Joint action in a disaster situation is a challenge for both professional and voluntary organisations at national level, and this is amplified when the rescue has to be carried out across borders. The effectiveness of local volunteer rescue organisations is unquestionable, as their local knowledge is an important asset in addition to their rapid response. Volunteer rescue organisations can help to tackle different types of damage with their specific training, specialised technical equipment and skills. As regards training, however, the obstacles to common standardised training must be identified. It is necessary to identify common training exercises that support common preparation as well as which training modules can be included in professional training.
Mediation between the different structures of disaster management agencies, and the harmonisation of training due to different qualifications, could be a first step towards common prevention and preparedness, and then towards unified intervention. The definition of common activities is possible through the joint definition of a set of expectations.
The bilateral agreements in force today, based on international law, contain a number of administrative constraints (e.g. prior authorisation of vehicles intervening on the other side of the border) that make a rapid response impossible. This can cause damage, even in terms of human lives.
Cross-border fires are still difficult to tackle because action and funding is at national level. By coordinating county fire plans, bilateral agreements can be reached to jointly prepare protocols for rapid intervention.