Emergency health services:
The compilation of the bilateral treaty has been managed by the two national authorities and rescue services, based on the results of the preparatory steps undertaken by the #ACCESS partners.
In second half of 2025, the #ACCESS project advanced its objectives through multiple activities, a brief summary of which can be found below.
The reference group meetings concluded in the spring of 2025. These meetings generated valuable working relationships and identified key topics for future progress in best practice collection and pilot project development, mainly in cross-border health, local products and the fight against invasive species. During the year the report of the reference group meetings were also prepared in English, Slovak and Hungarian.
The help desk service continued providing support to residents of the border region. The project updated and expanded 21 existing comprehensive case descriptions with additional details., Each case includes an overview, related news, and best practices. The obstacle database is continuously maintained with expert responses to facilitate cross-border problem-solving.
The project maintained strong online visibility through a dedicated website and active social media channels, with regular updates published on all platforms.
Following several sector-specific expert interviews and meetings, the development of solutions for overcoming cross-border obstacles has been started in many sectors, while in other topics, the stakeholder engagement is still in progress:
In the field of culture and public transport, cross-border obstacles were also registered and analysed by the project partners. At the same time, stakeholder engagement activities have been started by contacting the relevant authorities and organisations.
A highlight of this period was an obstacle solved on the recognition of archeological professional experience: the project partners investigated the reported obstacle and brought the Hungarian and Slovak Excavation Committee together in an expert consultation, where both sides supported mutual recognition of lead archaeologists’ professional experience and discussed making the two systems compatible (years-based vs points-based). As a practical step, Slovak experts advised the affected archaeologist to contact the Excavation Committee of the Slovak Republic, which can provide guidance on the eligibility certificate and assist with recognition if the legal conditions are met. As heritage protection systems are very similar, further high-level consultations were recommended on mutual recognition.

Local products on both sides of the border: another expert consultation on reducing...